Regular Season
GP
8
W-L
2-6
PPG
18
APG
7.3
RPG
10.9
SPG
0.625
BPG
0.25
AST/TO
6.4
FG%
82.9%
3PT%
53.8%
Five Star League Season 2
DynastyUpTop
No. 4 CNo. 6 All-Time C
Position
C Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
2
W-L
0-2
PPG
18.5
APG
6
RPG
8
SPG
0.5
BPG
0
AST/TO
—
FG%
89.5%
3PT%
75%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 8 | 2-6 | 18 | 7.3 | 10.9 | 0.625 | 0.25 | 6.4 | 82.9% | 53.8% |
| Playoffs | 2 | 0-2 | 18.5 | 6 | 8 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 89.5% | 75% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only. Published aggregate includes 0.0 turnovers per game.
Season 2 C ranking analysis
Regular season: 8 C games, 2-6, 18.0 PPG, 10.9 RPG, 7.2 APG, 1.1 TO, 82.9% FG, 53.8% 3PT
Playoffs: 2 complete C games, 0-2, 18.5 PPG, 8.0 RPG, 6.0 APG, 0.5 SPG, 0.0 BPG, 0.0 TO, 89.5% FG, 75.0% 3PT
Team context: No. 14 opponent PPG; bottom five opponent FG%
Dynasty was the best pure offensive center. Eighteen points, seven assists and 83% shooting is absurd, and he became even more efficient against Krypt in the playoffs—including a perfect 13-for-13, 28-point performance. His ball security was also outstanding for that workload.
The ranking is held down by a 2-8 combined center record, weak team defense, modest stocks and merely good rather than dominant rebounding. This formula does not allow losing to erase individual dominance, but it also cannot ignore defense and winning.
Why not higher: The defensive and team-impact categories separate him from the top three.
Why not lower: No center below him approaches his scoring, creation and efficiency combination.