Regular Season
GP
1
W-L
1-0
PPG
9
APG
1
RPG
2
SPG
0
BPG
0
AST/TO
1
FG%
66.7%
3PT%
33.3%
Position
SF Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
4
W-L
2-2
PPG
9.5
APG
2.5
RPG
—
SPG
1.8
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
62.5%
3PT%
50%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 1 | 1-0 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% |
| Playoffs | 4 | 2-2 | 9.5 | 2.5 | — | 1.8 | — | — | 62.5% | 50% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only. Published aggregate includes 0.5 turnovers per game.
Season 2 SF ranking analysis
Eligible SF sample: 1 regular-season game plus 4 complete playoff games
Playoffs: 4 complete SF games, 2-2, 9.5 PPG, 2.5 APG, 1.8 SPG, 0.5 TO, 62.5% FG, 50.0% 3PT
Team context: No. 4 in opponent PPG; No. 14 in opponent FG%
Earlyed-it enters the final list because his four documented playoff SF games bring him to the five-game minimum. Against Five Star Prospects, llKidBuu scored 12 in Game 1 and 23 in Game 2; Earlyed scored 15 and eight. Against Prolific, I Kill Shi scored 26 and 20, while Earlyed contributed 11 and four.
The defensive results are respectable, especially inside a top-four opponent-PPG unit, but the offensive production and tiny sample are not strong enough to climb into the main contender tier. Krypt’s No. 14 opponent-FG% rank also suggests the low opponent-PPG number was not solely the product of suffocating shot defense.
Why not higher: Five total games, modest offense and no signature shutdown of an elite creator. Why not lower: His playoff assignments were credible and the results were steadier than the matchup records of the final three.