Regular Season
GP
—
W-L
—
PPG
20.8
APG
5.3
RPG
—
SPG
—
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
64%
3PT%
72%
Position
SG Splits — Five Star League Season 1
Playoffs
GP
—
W-L
—
PPG
18.5
APG
6
RPG
—
SPG
—
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
—
3PT%
—
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | — | — | 20.8 | 5.3 | — | — | — | — | 64% | 72% |
| Playoffs | — | — | 18.5 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
- Regular Season: - Team record: 8-5 - PPG: 20.8 - APG: 5.3 - FG: 64% - 3PT: 72%
- Playoffs: - PPG: 18.5 - APG: 6.0 - Notable performance: 26 points - Team result: Lost 1-2 to GTG in Fear God Esports' first playoff series
SG — Season 1 Ranking Report
#### Regular Season
- Team record: 8-5
- PPG: 20.8
- APG: 5.3
- FG: 64%
- 3PT: 72%
#### Playoffs
- PPG: 18.5
- APG: 6.0
- Notable performance: 26 points
- Team result: Lost 1-2 to GTG in Fear God Esports' first playoff series
#### Final Ranking Analysis
Greenability delivered efficient scoring, secondary playmaking, and dependable two-way production before adding a respectable playoff showing.
Why not higher: The players above produced greater offense, stronger playoff résumés, or more game-changing overall impact.
Why not lower: His efficiency, versatility, and consistency secured a top-10 résumé.