Regular Season
GP
11
W-L
3-8
PPG
13.8
APG
2.6
RPG
3.6
SPG
1.0909
BPG
0.3636
AST/TO
2.1
FG%
57%
3PT%
54.8%
Position
Positions stay separate. iPlayHashTTV has records at C and PF. Each position is stored and displayed on its own — averages are never merged across positions.
PF Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
2
W-L
0-2
PPG
7
APG
1
RPG
1
SPG
1.5
BPG
1
AST/TO
—
FG%
36.4%
3PT%
44.4%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 11 | 3-8 | 13.8 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 1.0909 | 0.3636 | 2.1 | 57% | 54.8% |
| Playoffs | 2 | 0-2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | — | 36.4% | 44.4% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified TD Prep playoff series; two completed PF box scores.
Season 2 PF ranking analysis
Regular season: 11 PF games, 3-8, 13.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 2.6 APG, 1.1 SPG, 0.4 BPG, 57.0% FG, 54.8% 3PT
Playoffs: 2 complete PF games, 0-2, 7.0 PPG, 1.0 RPG, 1.0 APG, 1.5 SPG, 1.0 BPG, 1.0 TO, 36.4% FG, 44.4% 3PT
Team context: Bottom five opponent PPG; No. 15 opponent FG%
iPlayHash offered legitimate offensive volume and secondary passing across a strong 11-game sample. The shooting was adequate and the 3.6 rebounds were respectable.
For an anchor position, the defensive résumé is too weak: Hated World finished bottom five in opponent PPG and 15th in opponent FG%. The verified TD Prep series added some stocks, but only one rebound per game and 36.4% shooting in a sweep did not improve his overall case.
Why not higher: Defensive impact, playoff performance and winning all grade poorly.
Why not lower: His sustained 11-game regular-season offense and availability remain more valuable than the bottom two résumés.