Regular Season
GP
5
W-L
2-3
PPG
16
APG
2.8
RPG
5.8
SPG
2.4
BPG
0.6
AST/TO
1.4
FG%
87.8%
3PT%
63.6%
Positions stay separate. Ki1d_Lit has records at PF and SF. Each position is stored and displayed on its own — averages are never merged across positions.
GP
5
W-L
2-3
PPG
16
APG
2.8
RPG
5.8
SPG
2.4
BPG
0.6
AST/TO
1.4
FG%
87.8%
3PT%
63.6%
GP
1
W-L
0-1
PPG
9
APG
5
RPG
5
SPG
0
BPG
0
AST/TO
1
FG%
66.7%
3PT%
50%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 5 | 2-3 | 16 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 87.8% | 63.6% |
| Playoffs | 1 | 0-1 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% | 50% |
Regular season: 5 PF games, 2-3, 16.0 PPG, 5.8 RPG, 2.8 APG, 2.4 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 87.8% FG, 63.6% 3PT
Playoffs: 1 complete PF game, 9.0 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 5.0 APG, 0.0 SPG, 0.0 BPG, 5.0 TO, 66.7% FG, 50.0% 3PT; one shortened loss retained as context
Team context: No. 13 opponent PPG; No. 13 opponent FG%
Ki1d is easily one of the best offensive backends. Sixteen points, nearly six rebounds and 2.8 assists on 88% shooting is outrageous efficiency. He also generated 2.4 steals, so this is not an offense-only résumé.
The problem is that TD Prep ranked 13th in both opponent PPG and opponent FG%, went 2-3 in his regular-season PF games and lost both documented playoff games. The completed playoff performance included five turnovers and no stocks.
Why not higher: The overall defensive results and winning do not support a top-five backend ranking.
Why not lower: His offensive value is so far beyond most of the field—and his regular-season activity was still strong—that dropping him further would overrate team defense.