Regular Season
GP
6
W-L
4-2
PPG
6.8
APG
4.5
RPG
9.2
SPG
0.3333
BPG
0.6667
AST/TO
3.4
FG%
67.9%
3PT%
33.3%
Position
C Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
1
W-L
0-1
PPG
8
APG
4
RPG
10
SPG
0
BPG
0
AST/TO
4
FG%
80%
3PT%
—
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 6 | 4-2 | 6.8 | 4.5 | 9.2 | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | 3.4 | 67.9% | 33.3% |
| Playoffs | 1 | 0-1 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 80% | — |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified playoff position split from supplied box scores and locked Season 2 ranking analysis; shortened games are excluded where noted.
Season 2 C ranking analysis
Regular season: 6 C games, 4-2, 6.8 PPG, 9.2 RPG, 4.5 APG, 0.7 BPG, 1.3 TO, 67.9% FG, 33.3% 3PT
Playoffs: 1 complete C game, 8.0 PPG, 10.0 RPG, 4.0 APG, 0.0 SPG, 0.0 BPG, 1.0 TO, 80.0% FG; one shortened loss retained as context
IIIAL provided efficient low-usage offense, passing and a winning regular-season record on a top-six scoring defense. His completed playoff game was solid despite the loss.
The scoring and rebounding volume were only moderate, with very little steal production or spacing. He profiles as a useful role center rather than a major engine.
Why not higher: Limited total production.
Why not lower: Winning and respectable team defense give him a stronger impact case than the final four.