Regular Season
GP
—
W-L
—
PPG
25.5
APG
8.4
RPG
—
SPG
—
BPG
—
AST/TO
3
FG%
64%
3PT%
68%
Position
PG Splits — Five Star League Season 1
Playoffs
GP
—
W-L
—
PPG
—
APG
—
RPG
—
SPG
—
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
—
3PT%
—
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | — | — | 25.5 | 8.4 | — | — | — | 3 | 64% | 68% |
| Playoffs | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
- Regular Season: - Team record: 4-7 - PPG: 25.5 - APG: 8.4 - FG: 64% - 3PT: 68% - AST/TO: 3.0
- Playoffs: - Did not participate - Vigilante was disqualified because of roster issues; Saint Johns advanced 0-0
PG — Season 1 Ranking Report
#### Regular Season
- Team record: 4-7
- PPG: 25.5
- APG: 8.4
- FG: 64%
- 3PT: 68%
- AST/TO: 3.0
#### Playoffs
- Did not participate
- Vigilante was disqualified because of roster issues; Saint Johns advanced 0-0
#### Final Ranking Analysis
NiteBlock quietly produced one of the league's most efficient offensive seasons, carrying a heavy scoring and facilitating workload without sacrificing efficiency.
Why not higher: Vigilante's disqualification prevented him from adding playoff performances, while the guards ahead built stronger regular-season or postseason résumés.
Why not lower: He should not be penalized for circumstances outside his control, and there was no playoff performance providing on-court evidence to lower his ranking.