Regular Season
GP
7
W-L
2-5
PPG
8
APG
—
RPG
2.9
SPG
—
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
76%
3PT%
60%
Position
PF Splits — Five Star League Season 1
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 7 | 2-5 | 8 | — | 2.9 | — | — | — | 76% | 60% |
- Regular Season: 2-5; 8.0 PPG, 2.9 RPG, 0.6 SPG, 76% FG, 60% 3PT
PF — Season 1 Ranking Report
Regular Season: 8.0 PPG | 2.9 RPG | 0.6 SPG | 76% FG | 60% 3PT | 2-5 Record
Rocabye filled his role well as a low-usage backend in Vigilante's 5-out offense. He consistently knocked down open shots, finishing the season shooting 76% from the field and 60% from three, while also contributing 2.9 rebounds and 0.6 steals per game. His efficiency was among the best at the position, but he wasn't asked to create much offense, and Vigilante finished near the bottom of the standings, limiting his overall impact compared to the players ranked ahead of him.
Why He's Ranked #13
Rocabye was an efficient role player who understood his job and rarely forced offense. His ability to space the floor and play within the system gave Vigilante solid backend production throughout the regular season.
Why Not Higher
The players ahead of him either carried larger offensive roles, contributed more defensively, or had stronger team success. While Rocabye was extremely efficient, his lower scoring volume and limited overall production made it difficult to rank him above those players.
Why Not Lower
Lippys finished the season with better scoring numbers, but Rocabye was considerably more efficient throughout the regular season and contributed more consistently within his role. His shot selection and offensive efficiency were enough to keep him one spot ahead in the final rankings.