Regular Season
GP
3
W-L
3-0
PPG
11.3
APG
4.7
RPG
13.3
SPG
0.6667
BPG
0
AST/TO
14
FG%
64%
3PT%
66.7%
GP
3
W-L
3-0
PPG
11.3
APG
4.7
RPG
13.3
SPG
0.6667
BPG
0
AST/TO
14
FG%
64%
3PT%
66.7%
GP
2
W-L
0-2
PPG
7.5
APG
2
RPG
7
SPG
0
BPG
1
AST/TO
—
FG%
50%
3PT%
0%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 3 | 3-0 | 11.3 | 4.7 | 13.3 | 0.6667 | 0 | 14 | 64% | 66.7% |
| Playoffs | 2 | 0-2 | 7.5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | — | 50% | 0% |
Regular season: 3 C games, 3-0, 11.3 PPG, 13.3 RPG, 4.7 APG, 0.7 SPG, 0.3 TO, 64.0% FG, 66.7% 3PT
Playoffs: 2 complete C games, 0-2, 7.5 PPG, 7.0 RPG, 2.0 APG, 0.0 SPG, 1.0 BPG, 1.0 TO, 50.0% FG, 0.0% 3PT
Splash qualifies exactly at five games. His three-game regular-season stint was excellent—undefeated, productive and efficient—but Five Star cut his production sharply in the playoffs.
The bottom-five team defense and tiny sample limit certainty. His postseason blocks were a positive, but the offense and rebounding did not hold.
Why not higher: Small sample, weak team-defense context and playoff decline.
Why not lower: The regular-season peak was better than the lower-ranked centers’ best stretches.