Regular Season
GP
9
W-L
7-2
PPG
11.6
APG
1
RPG
1.7
SPG
2
BPG
0.3333
AST/TO
2.3
FG%
66.1%
3PT%
56.4%
Position
Positions stay separate. SuperfentbabyOD has records at C and SF. Each position is stored and displayed on its own — averages are never merged across positions.
SF Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
2
W-L
2-0
PPG
31
APG
1.5
RPG
—
SPG
3
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
92%
3PT%
100%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 9 | 7-2 | 11.6 | 1 | 1.7 | 2 | 0.3333 | 2.3 | 66.1% | 56.4% |
| Playoffs | 2 | 2-0 | 31 | 1.5 | — | 3 | — | — | 92% | 100% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only. Published aggregate includes 0.5 turnovers per game.
Season 2 SF ranking analysis
Regular season: 9 SF games, 7-2, 11.6 PPG, 2.0 SPG, 66.1% FG, 56.4% 3PT
Playoffs: 2 complete SF games, 2-0, 31.0 PPG, 1.5 APG, 3.0 SPG, 0.5 TO, 92.0% FG, 100% 3PT
Team context: No. 10 in opponent PPG; No. 8 in opponent FG%
Superfent has one of the strongest defensive portfolios at the position. He held IshootPeaks below his normal scoring in both regular-season meetings and forced seven turnovers in one; helped hold JustaCasual to 18; held Venom to eight and 10; and produced useful disruption against Drip, including a 15-point, five-turnover game. The 31-point Drip game prevents the résumé from being spotless, but the larger body of work is clearly positive.
His Round 2 performance against GTG was one of the defining SF series of the playoffs. Superfent scored 34 on 12-for-13 and 28 on 11-for-12, while SGBG-TONY- scored only five and seven. That is exactly what this formula rewards: elite direct matchup impact plus efficient offense in meaningful games. Prolific later used a different SF alignment, so those two games—not team results from a position he was not playing—are what boost his individual case.
Why not higher: ViCiouS sustained much greater offensive volume across a larger postseason SF workload.
Why not lower: Few SFs produced a playoff series with such a decisive two-way advantage, and his regular-season defense was already top-tier.