Regular Season
GP
7
W-L
2-5
PPG
24.1
APG
12.7
RPG
1.3
SPG
0.4286
BPG
0
AST/TO
3.6
FG%
74.4%
3PT%
61.3%
Position
PG Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
6
W-L
—
PPG
30.5
APG
12.7
RPG
—
SPG
—
BPG
—
AST/TO
4.8
FG%
80.5%
3PT%
75%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 7 | 2-5 | 24.1 | 12.7 | 1.3 | 0.4286 | 0 | 3.6 | 74.4% | 61.3% |
| Playoffs | 6 | — | 30.5 | 12.7 | — | — | — | 4.8 | 80.5% | 75% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only.
Season 2 PG ranking analysis
Regular season: 24.1 PPG, 12.7 APG, 3.6 A/TO, 74% FG, 61% 3PT. Official record was 2-5
Playoffs: 30.5 PPG, 12.7 APG, 4.75 A/TO, 80.5% FG, 75% 3PT across six games actually played.
What puts Brumps #2 is not just the raw playoff numbers. It is where those numbers came from. The biggest knock on him all regular season was team success. The individual production was already elite, but people could say, “okay, you’re putting up 24 and almost 13 assists, but you’re losing.”
Then the playoffs came and that criticism got answered directly.
He swept the #1 seed and #1 defense, which is the best single opponent context any PG on this list faced and beat. In that series he averaged 31.5 points and 13 assists while shooting 86.7% from the field and 87.5% from three. That is not just good offense. That is basically complete offensive control against the league’s best defense.
Even in Round 3, the series loss is weird contextually because Game 1 was a team forfeit. In the two games actually played, he put up 32/10 and 35/14
Why he is above Kari: Kari scored more in the playoffs, but Brumps had significantly more playmaking while being even more efficient. The #1-defense sweep separates them.