Regular Season
GP
2
W-L
1-1
PPG
13.5
APG
8.5
RPG
14
SPG
0.5
BPG
0
AST/TO
5.7
FG%
68.4%
3PT%
20%
Position
C Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
6
W-L
4-2
PPG
11.2
APG
5.3
RPG
10.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
0.2
AST/TO
—
FG%
59.1%
3PT%
52.9%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 2 | 1-1 | 13.5 | 8.5 | 14 | 0.5 | 0 | 5.7 | 68.4% | 20% |
| Playoffs | 6 | 4-2 | 11.2 | 5.3 | 10.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | — | 59.1% | 52.9% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only. Published aggregate includes 1.3 turnovers per game.
Season 2 C ranking analysis
Regular season: 2 C games, 1-1, 13.5 PPG, 14.0 RPG, 8.5 APG, 0.5 SPG, 1.5 TO, 68.4% FG, 20.0% 3PT
Playoffs: 6 complete C games, 4-2, 11.2 PPG, 10.8 RPG, 5.3 APG, 0.5 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.3 TO, 59.1% FG, 52.9% 3PT
Team context: semifinal run
GLOXTRU became Prolific’s full-time playoff center and delivered a strong all-around run. Across six games he averaged a double-double, more than five assists and efficient spacing while Prolific beat GTG and Krypt.
The defensive production was modest and his playoff FG% fell below the elite standard set by this center field. Still, eight total games with this much passing, rebounding and winning deserve a top-eight placement.
Why not higher: Average team-defense and limited stocks.
Why not lower: His postseason workload and balanced production are much stronger than the remaining candidates.