Regular Season
GP
4
W-L
4-0
PPG
16.3
APG
1.5
RPG
0.8
SPG
1.75
BPG
0.25
AST/TO
3
FG%
60.5%
3PT%
61.5%
Position
SF Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
7
W-L
6-1
PPG
11.1
APG
1.3
RPG
—
SPG
1.6
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
74.4%
3PT%
57.9%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 4 | 4-0 | 16.3 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.75 | 0.25 | 3 | 60.5% | 61.5% |
| Playoffs | 7 | 6-1 | 11.1 | 1.3 | — | 1.6 | — | — | 74.4% | 57.9% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only. Published aggregate includes 0.4 turnovers per game.
Season 2 SF ranking analysis
Regular season: 4 SF games, 4-0, 16.2 PPG, 1.8 SPG, 60.5% FG, 61.5% 3PT
Playoffs: 7 complete SF games, 6-1, 11.1 PPG, 1.3 APG, 1.6 SPG, 0.4 TO, 74.4% FG, 57.9% 3PT;
Team context: No. 12 in opponent PPG; No. 12 in opponent FG%
He was an important two-way piece on the champion and produced big postseason offensive games, including 17 on 6-for-7 and 16 on 6-for-6 against Prolific. In the Finals, he helped keep TBuc to 17 and 18 in the two documented Order wins, forcing five and six turnovers.
The matchup defense was highly uneven. ItsBleus scored 31 in the completed Round 2 game; Brumps scored 35 and 32 in the Elite Eight; and I Kill Shi followed a 20-point semifinal opener with 42 in Game 2. Hunt competed, generated steals and ultimately won, but several opposing PGs still produced at star level.
Why not higher: A champion’s résumé cannot erase repeated high-end matchup losses when individual defense is 40%.
Why not lower: The Finals defense on TBuc, efficient secondary scoring, heavy availability and championship impact create more total value than the remaining field.