Regular Season
GP
9
W-L
4-5
PPG
11.7
APG
6.3
RPG
11.7
SPG
0.2222
BPG
0.5556
AST/TO
3.4
FG%
73.8%
3PT%
45%
Position
C Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
2
W-L
0-2
PPG
11.5
APG
4.5
RPG
8.5
SPG
0
BPG
0
AST/TO
—
FG%
56.3%
3PT%
42.9%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 9 | 4-5 | 11.7 | 6.3 | 11.7 | 0.2222 | 0.5556 | 3.4 | 73.8% | 45% |
| Playoffs | 2 | 0-2 | 11.5 | 4.5 | 8.5 | 0 | 0 | — | 56.3% | 42.9% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only. Published aggregate includes 2.0 turnovers per game.
Season 2 C ranking analysis
Regular season: 9 C games, 4-5, 11.7 PPG, 11.7 RPG, 6.3 APG, 0.6 BPG, 1.9 TO, 73.8% FG, 45.0% 3PT
Playoffs: 2 complete C games, 0-2, 11.5 PPG, 8.5 RPG, 4.5 APG, 0.0 SPG, 0.0 BPG, 2.0 TO, 56.3% FG, 42.9% 3PT
Quincy provided steady double-double production, strong passing and good regular-season efficiency. GTG’s No. 5 opponent-FG% finish gives his interior role credible support.
The team was under .500 in his regular-season center games and was swept by Prolific, with Quincy’s rebounding, assists and efficiency all declining.
Why not higher: Playoff decline and middling winning.
Why not lower: Nine regular-season games of 12/12/6 production provide a strong, reliable foundation.