Regular Season
GP
5
W-L
2-3
PPG
11.8
APG
2.2
RPG
9.4
SPG
1
BPG
0.6
AST/TO
1.8
FG%
60.5%
3PT%
30.8%
Position
Positions stay separate. Smoovebucketz has records at C and PF. Each position is stored and displayed on its own — averages are never merged across positions.
C Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
1
W-L
0-1
PPG
20
APG
2
RPG
7
SPG
0
BPG
0
AST/TO
0.7
FG%
76.9%
3PT%
0%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 5 | 2-3 | 11.8 | 2.2 | 9.4 | 1 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 60.5% | 30.8% |
| Playoffs | 1 | 0-1 | 20 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 76.9% | 0% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified playoff position split from supplied box scores and locked Season 2 ranking analysis; shortened games are excluded where noted.
Season 2 C ranking analysis
Regular season: 5 C games, 2-3, 11.8 PPG, 9.4 RPG, 2.2 APG, 1.0 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 1.2 TO, 60.5% FG, 30.8% 3PT
Playoffs: 1 complete C game, 20.0 PPG, 7.0 RPG, 2.0 APG, 0.0 SPG, 0.0 BPG, 3.0 TO, 76.9% FG, 0.0% 3PT; one shortened loss retained as context
Smoovebucketz had a balanced regular-season line and exploded for 20 points in the completed Obsidian playoff game. His steals and blocks were respectable relative to this field.
The shooting range, losing record, average rebounding and No. 13 defense keep the overall case in the lower half. The playoff scoring was impressive but came in a loss with three turnovers.
Why not higher: Too little winning, spacing and team defensive success.
Why not lower: His two-way statistical production is stronger than the remaining centers.