Regular Season
GP
4
W-L
3-1
PPG
23
APG
6.8
RPG
0.5
SPG
1.25
BPG
0.25
AST/TO
3.9
FG%
56.7%
3PT%
41.7%
Position
SG Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
1
W-L
—
PPG
19
APG
2
RPG
—
SPG
—
BPG
—
AST/TO
—
FG%
—
3PT%
—
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 4 | 3-1 | 23 | 6.8 | 0.5 | 1.25 | 0.25 | 3.9 | 56.7% | 41.7% |
| Playoffs | 1 | — | 19 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified playoff position split from supplied box scores and locked Season 2 ranking analysis; shortened games are excluded where noted.
Season 2 SG ranking analysis
Verified SG résumé: 5 completed games, 3–2 record; 22.2 PPG, 5.8 APG, 56.2 FG%, 43.5 3PT%.
stattDPOY brings strong playmaking and the best regular-season suppression mark in the pool: opposing SGs scored about 7.9 points below their baseline. In his playoff SG appearance against Five Star, he scored 19 with two assists while his opposing SG scored six. That is meaningful two-way evidence, even in a small sample.
The five-game minimum sample and modest 43.5% three-point rate keep him below Flukies. His defense is impressive, but the model shrinks extreme matchup numbers when they come from only four regular-season games, preventing a tiny sample from being treated as a definitive shutdown résumé. He is above Taftics because he supplied more scoring, playmaking, and stronger defensive results on the available record.