Regular Season
GP
16
W-L
9-7
PPG
19.4
APG
3.7
RPG
0
SPG
1.875
BPG
0.0625
AST/TO
3.1
FG%
66.1%
3PT%
64.6%
Position
SG Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
1
W-L
0-1
PPG
14
APG
2
RPG
0
SPG
1
BPG
0
AST/TO
—
FG%
66.7%
3PT%
66.7%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 16 | 9-7 | 19.4 | 3.7 | 0 | 1.875 | 0.0625 | 3.1 | 66.1% | 64.6% |
| Playoffs | 1 | 0-1 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 66.7% | 66.7% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified playoff position split from supplied box scores and locked Season 2 ranking analysis; shortened games are excluded where noted.
Season 2 SG ranking analysis
Verified SG résumé: 17 completed games plus 1 shortened team-result game, 9–9 record; 19.1 PPG, 3.6 APG, 66.1 FG%, 64.6 3PT%.
Taftics owns the largest SG sample in the ranking, and that reliability matters. Across 17 complete box scores he remained extremely efficient, especially from three, and finished .500 in team results. In the completed Round 2 loss to The Order he scored 14 on 6-of-9 shooting; the shortened second loss affects the series record but not his individual averages.
He is not higher because the role and impact were more complementary than the players above him. His regular-season matchup suppression was essentially neutral, and 19.1 points with 3.6 assists does not create the same offensive pressure as the top creators. He is above SKINNEMLOW because he scored more efficiently over a larger complete sample, while their team and defensive cases are close enough that the shooting gap becomes decisive.