Regular Season
GP
4
W-L
4-0
PPG
13
APG
3.8
RPG
3.3
SPG
2.75
BPG
0.75
AST/TO
3.8
FG%
52.8%
3PT%
46.2%
Position
PF Splits — Five Star League Season 2
Playoffs
GP
4
W-L
2-2
PPG
10.5
APG
1.5
RPG
1.5
SPG
3
BPG
0.3
AST/TO
—
FG%
65.4%
3PT%
42.9%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 4 | 4-0 | 13 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 2.75 | 0.75 | 3.8 | 52.8% | 46.2% |
| Playoffs | 4 | 2-2 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 0.3 | — | 65.4% | 42.9% |
- Regular Season: Audited regular-season position split; official team records are stored separately.
- Playoffs: Verified completed playoff box scores only; shortened and missing-stat games remain context-only. Published aggregate includes 0.5 turnovers per game.
Season 2 PF ranking analysis
Regular season: 4 PF games, 4-0, 13.0 PPG, 3.2 RPG, 3.8 APG, 2.8 SPG, 0.8 BPG, 52.8% FG, 46.2% 3PT
Playoffs: 4 complete PF games, 2-2, 10.5 PPG, 1.5 RPG, 1.5 APG, 3.0 SPG, 0.3 BPG, 0.5 TO, 65.4% FG, 42.9% 3PT
xM1Rzx produced the strongest combination of defensive activity, playmaking and winning outside Scottie. He generated 2.8 steals and nearly four assists during a 4-0 regular-season PF sample, then raised the steal rate to 3.0 in four playoff games. His five-steal performances against Five Star Prospects and Prolific are the type of possession-swinging production that directly supports the backend case.
Krypt’s No. 4 opponent-PPG defense matters, although the No. 14 opponent-FG% rank suggests the unit was not an across-the-board shooting clamp. His own regular-season shooting was also mediocre before improving in the playoffs.
Why not No. 1: Scottie supplied better regular-season offense, a larger total sample and a deeper run.
Why not lower: xM1Rzx’s defensive production remained elite across both stages, and he contributed offensively rather than functioning as a one-way anchor.