Regular Season
GP
5
W-L
4-1
PPG
7.2
APG
1.4
RPG
4.4
SPG
1.6
BPG
0
AST/TO
2.3
FG%
60.9%
3PT%
53.3%
GP
5
W-L
4-1
PPG
7.2
APG
1.4
RPG
4.4
SPG
1.6
BPG
0
AST/TO
2.3
FG%
60.9%
3PT%
53.3%
| Split | GP | W-L | PPG | APG | RPG | SPG | BPG | AST/TO | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Season | 5 | 4-1 | 7.2 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 0 | 2.3 | 60.9% | 53.3% |
Regular season: 5 PF games, 4-1, 7.2 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 1.4 APG, 1.6 SPG, 0.0 BPG, 60.9% FG, 53.3% 3PT
Playoffs: No documented playoff appearances at PF; GTG used xoWickCityxo at PF in the available Round 2 games
Team context: No. 11 opponent PPG; No. 5 opponent FG%
Smooth provided efficient low-volume offense, solid rebounding and a 4-1 record. GTG’s No. 5 opponent-FG% finish gives the defensive role some credibility.
The sample is minimal, he recorded no blocks, and he was not the PF in the available playoff lineup. His impact profile is steady but lacks a category that demands a higher placement.
Why not higher: Limited sample and defensive production.
Why not lower: Positive record, efficient spacing and respectable team shooting defense.